- Simpson’s lawyers claimed on Wednesday that the former sports star’s 2008 trial in Las Vegas was tainted by his fame
- Simpson, 66, was found guilty of leading armed men in a confrontation with two sports memorabilia dealers at a Las Vegas casino hotel in 2007
- The 66-year-old is serving 33 years in a Nevada prison
O.J. Simpson’s lawyers submitted a super-sized appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court, seeking the former football star’s release from prison and a new trial in his 2007 Las Vegas armed-robbery case.
The lawyers met a midnight on Wednesday deadline to submit a request for them to review Simpson’s claim that 2008 trial in Las Vegas was tainted by his fame and notoriety following his 1995 acquittal in Los Angeles in the deaths of his ex-wife and her friend.
However, the document totaled 19,993 words, court spokesman Michael Sommermeyer said on Thursday. That was some 43 per cent longer than the 14,000-word length limit the court had set.
O.J. Simpson during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas in January. Simpson’s lawyers submitted a supersized appea on Wednesday asking the Nevada Supreme Court for a new trial in his 2007 Las Vegas armed robbery case
It will be up to the seven justices to decide whether to accept it for filing and consideration. Until that time, the document wasn’t made public. The court hasn’t decided whether to hear oral arguments.
Simpson, 66, is serving nine to 33 years in a northern Nevada prison after being found guilty of leading a group of armed men in a September 2007 confrontation with two sports memorabilia dealers at a Las Vegas casino hotel.
He was convicted of kidnapping, armed robbery and other charges. He’s not eligible for parole until late 2017.
The appeal stems from arguments rejected last year by Clark County District Court Judge Linda Marie Bell that Simpson’s trial attorney botched Simpson’s trial and first appeal to the state Supreme Court, the only appeals court in Nevada.
Simpson attorney Patricia Palm said the appeal ran long because she and attorneys Ozzie Fumo and Tom Pitaro were responding in detail to the judge’s November 26 ruling, which totaled 101 pages.
Simpson’s lawyers requested a new trial for their client saying his 2007 armed robbery court case was unfair because it was tainted by his notoriety. Simpson was acquitted in 1995 in the deaths of his wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend
The judge’s decision stemmed from five days of hearings in Las Vegas on a 94-page petition Palm filed in May 2012 seeking a new trial on 22 possible grounds.
The judge said she reviewed the entire Simpson court record and determined that evidence was overwhelming that Simpson orchestrated the armed kidnapping and robbery of two sports memorabilia dealers.
Bell said Simpson’s current attorneys failed to demonstrate how his former lawyer’s actions changed the outcome of the case.
Simpson claimed he was trying to retrieve from the memorabilia dealers items that had been stolen from him after his Los Angeles trial and a 1997 civil court a wrongful-death judgment that put him on the hook for $33.5 million to the estates his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman.
The NFL hall of famer testified last year that he thought he had a right to get his own belongings back, and he never knew any of the men with him were carrying guns.